Monday, June 14, 2010
Module #9 Reflection on My Own Working on the Rubric and the Course Design
to the higher levels that are essential for learning and growth in any discipline or profession.
To address the use of rubrics in course assignments this paper aims to provide:
• An overview of the types and purposes of rubrics.
• A process for designing rubrics for course use.
• Description of the measurement objectives in typical courses in coordination with learning/growth opportunities for all skill domains.
• An introduction to the use of measurement theory and criteria as a basis for insights about how to improve rubrics.
• Insights about rubric applications that will guide effective usage.
(retrieved from http://www.elicbrown.com/conferences/Using%20a%20Quality%20Evaluation%20Rubric%20in%20Online%20Course%20Supplements.ppt.pdf )
Actually, I was not familiar with this kind of evaluation system, rubric before I started learning TESOL MA program. Even I didn’t know rubrics are flexible tools that can be developed relatively easily in practice situations to capture the key performance criteria and standards expected. I learned that even in situations that require quick solutions, e.g., a new course assigned to an educator at the last minute, it is possible to maintain quality if measurement tools match up with the main learning opportunities planned.
Quality learning environments must be developed with guidance from methodologies for program, course, and activity design. Rubrics can easily be developed to capture the key performance criteria and standards expected. Simpler rubrics are highly valuable because even a lower-quality measure will provide much better evidence about the nature of learning than estimation on the basis of “experience.” Like any tool, however, one will become more expert only by direct work with creating and applying of rubrics in real contexts.
We, educators must continuously improve their uses of measurement in order to facilitate quality learning and growth. Frankly speaking, to make a rubric and design language course are most difficult assignments in the whole course but it’s very helpful for me.
Module #8 Course Design
Sooyeun Kom
CCLC-prep, Kangnam, Seoul, Korea
June 9, 2010
Antoaneta Bonev, Ph.D.
California State University San Bernardino
5500 University Parkway
San Bernardino, CA 92374
Course Title : Composition & Grammar 1
Term Year : 1st quarter of 2010
Days : twice a week (Tuesday and Thursday)
Class Time : 50 mins/session
Grade laevel : 10th in EFL
Course Syllabus
Instructor: Sooyeun Kim
E-mail: rita9860@hotmail.com
Course Description:
In this course students will concentrate on recognizing and producing accurate grammatical structures at the sentence level with diligent attention paid to editing their work.
Course Outline by Topic
1. The Simple Present and Adverbs of Frequency
2. Punctuation & Capitalization
3. Adjectives, Articles, Nouns & Pronouns
4. The Simple Past Tense
5. Compound Sentences and Conjunctions
6. The Simple Future Tense
7. Building Simple Sentences and Using Correct Word Order
8. The Simple Present and Progressive
9. Adjectives, Nouns, Pronouns & Articles
10. The Simple Past Tense
11. The Simple Future Tense
12. Modal Auxiliaries
Standards
Integrating the ESL Standards Into Classroom Practice: Grades 9-12
http://www.tesol.org/s_tesol/sec_document.asp?CID=95&DID=1900
Course Objectives:
Students successfully completing this course will be able to:
ü evidence proficiency with parts of speech
ü comprehend and use basic punctuation and capitalization
ü construct simple and compound sentences using correct word order and simple conjunctions
ü demonstrate a command of the simple tenses and the ability to identify irregular verb forms and make accurate subject, verb agreement
ü distinguish between and construct affirmative, negative and interrogative forms
ü write descriptive and narrative sentences reflective of their everyday experiences
ü use simple modals
Course Format:
Class sessions will include lectures as well as interactive pair and group activities.
Assignments: Grading Scale:
The final grade will be computed as follows:
Quizzes 25% 100%-92% = A
Writing Assignments 25% 91% -82% = B
Term A Exam 25 % 81% - 72% = C
Term B Exam 25% 72% - 62% = D
61% - 0% = F
Assignments:
All assignments submitted must be type written. Assignments must be submitted on time as late assignments will NOT be accepted. Students are responsible for finding out about and completing assignments even if they are absent. Written assignments and their due dates can be found in the attached course calendar.
Grades:
Students desiring exam grade results from their instructor should send an email to the instructor, who will respond with the information requested.
Academic Expectations:
Attendance, Tardiness and Homework
Students are expected to punctually attend all classes. Please refer to the attendance policy sheet that you have been given. This document details attendance expectations. Please be reminded that students arriving to class more than 15 minutes late will be recorded as absent. Students are expected to complete all homework assignments.
Academic Honor Code:
As students, the degree of honesty and integrity employed when creating and preparing work is expected to be of the utmost quality. Dishonest preparation and submission of work assigned – and in particular, plagiarism – will not be tolerated and may lead to failure of the course and dismissal form the institution.
Classroom Rules:
ü No food or drink will be allowed in the classroom.
ü Interruptions from electronic devices (cell phones, pagers etc.) will not be allowed.
ü Computers and electronic translators should be switched off during class and used only when allowed by the instructor.
ü Required Text:
Great Sentences for Great Paragraphs ISBN: 0-618-05617-3
Course Calendar:
Sunday, May 30, 2010
Module #7 Create a Course Evaluation Rubric
There are 7 criteria Graves mentions about evaluation of teaching materials
1. The goals and objectives
2. The course content
3. The needs assessment
4. The way the course is organized
5. The materials and methods
6. The learning assessment plan
7. The course evaluation plan
Based on this suggestion, I modified categories and made my own rubric for science textbook evaluation as follow
Course Evaluation : Blue Planet (Level 2 of 6)
- Target teaching level : Intermediate students (Korean, 1st grades)
- Goals of course : To improve students' science knowledge
- Class hour: Once a week
- For how long each time : 50 mins.
- Total time: 6 months course
As an ESL educator, whenever I had to choose appropriate textbooks for students, I used to have a hard time to do it because most of English textbooks are made for native students. This series contains carefully selected science topics based on the students ages, abilities and interest, and taking into account their specific needs as English-language learners as well. So we decided to choose these textbooks for kindergarteners and elementary school student as main textbook of science class.
***Inside of book***
Blue planet is a six-level primary science series, designed to provide additional activities for students who are learning English. The student activity books include writing exercises, hand-on activities, exciting experiments and interesting points for discussion.
Through the science topics, students are encouraged to express their own ideas, question, investigate and come to animated conclusions.
Especially children love to have an experiment they suggested in classroom and we add some supplement experiment kit to classroom activities.
The actual evaluation of Blue planet
Contents – 5 points
The contents of this book provides accurate information that is understandable for young learners and the ideas are completely discussed in each section, many related experiments covers all of standards and meets the needs of all level of learners
Also they are using easy vocabulary for ESL learners.
Organization – 4 points
The format is fair. Page layout, size and style of each pages are good-looking. I like chapter summaries particularly. Review , glossary, and index are included.
Supplementary Information – 5 points
This textbook provides many resources related with scientific information. There is a teacher’s addition so teacher can prepare extra worksheets and flash card for classroom activities easily.
Also they provide good idea for experiment such as water balloon rocket or paper cup tower. It’s easy to find the material for experiment.
Real-Life Examples – 3 points
The textbook includes lots of information about very various animals and habitat but most of them are unfamiliar with Korean kids. Also Americans use different scale from Koreans as like feet, inch, pound etc. so it is hard to understand and should be converted into meter or Kilogram
Use of Colorful Illustrations – 5 points
Many pictures, maps, graphs related to the reading are included. Children really love this picture. Also teacher can use the flash card and fact sheets in teachers’ edition. It’s really fantastic.
Reference:
Course evaluation sites: online learning. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://online.umwblogs.org/course-evaluation-sites
Graves, K. (2001). Designing language courses. Boston,MA: Heinle & Heinle Pub.
Saturday, May 22, 2010
Module #6 Blog reflection of Chapter 5
Designing our own program as an in-service teacher might be really time consuming and also difficult to teach how to do it to pre-service teachers. But in the long run it might be rewarding when knowing that we are giving the students what they want and need and not just what has been decided by the authorities. Curriculum includes the philosophy, purposes, design and implementation of a whole program.
The factors to consider in defining the context such as: people, physical setting, stakeholders, teaching resources and time are crucial if we design the program instead of just following the textbook. Graves (2000) mentions that defining the context and articulating your beliefs serve as the foundation for the process to follow when designing your own program. Assessing needs, formulating goals and objectives, developing materials, designing an assessment plan, organizing the course and conceptualizing content is described as a framework of course development process. Although there is no one way of organizing a course; the factors mentioned can help you choose how to do it. The results have to make sense to you, to the students, and to the authorities.
What are goals and objectives and what is their relationship?
Goals
It is mentioned that “stating your goals helps to bring into focus your visions and priorities for the course” Graves (2000: 75p). And she keeps on saying that they are general statements, but they are not vague.
Objectives
Objectives are more specific than goals. They break down aims into smaller units of learning, and typically describe learning in terms of observable behavior or performance in terms of what a learner will be able to do. Objectives help planning the course and enable evaluators to judge the success or failure of a program. Formulating goals and objectives helps to build a clear vision of what you will teach. A clear set of goals and objectives can provide the basis for your assessment plan (p.79)
What are ways to formulate and articulate goals and objectives?
How to formulate goals
The first step is to list all the possible goals you could have for your particular course, based on your conceptualization of content, your beliefs, and/or your assessment of students’ needs. Next step is to look for redundancies, and to identify priorities based on your beliefs and your context. There is a similar framework which I used to consider whenever I made a curriculum (p.85)
-Language goals : language skills learners are expected to acquire in the classroom
-Strategic goals : strategies learners use to learn the language
-Philosophical goals : changes in learners’ attitudes or social behaviors that result from classroom instruction
-Method or process goals : the activities learners will engage in
How to formulate objectives
Mager who wrote on performance objectives suggests that for an objective to be useful, it should contain three components: Performance, condition and criterion. Performance describes what the learners will be able to do, condition describes the circumstances in which the learners are able to something, and criterion, the degree to which they are able to do something and criterion, the degree to which they are able to do something. (p. 86)
When reflecting on our own teaching we know that most of the time, we have used a commercial textbook as our syllabus for the different levels of English we have taught along our in-service years. Sometimes we modify something or add what we consider is missing in the current book used. But we do not take into consideration that most of the books have not been designed specifically for our different contexts. It is not the same to teach to students from a capital city than it is to teach students in a Secondary School up in the mountains where they do not have any kind of access to computers and less to the internet. In my opinion, both goals and objectives should be states in terms of the level of learners and their specific situation. Also I used to meet extremely enthusiastic new teachers who try to pack too much into one objective, so we should limit each objective to a specific skill or language area.
Sunday, May 16, 2010
Module #5 - Annotated Bibliography-revised
This assignment was conducted by Sooyeun Kim, Sujin Kim and Youngran Song as a group project. The target learners are elementary school students and especially it is focused on reading and the related designing curriculum.
Citation 1:
Armbruster B. B., Lehr, F., Osborn, J. (2003). Put reading first: the research building blocks for teaching children to read. Jessup, MD: National Institute for Literacy.
Summary:
This paper was published by the Partnership for Reading. It is a collaborative effort of the National Institute for Literacy, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the U.S. Department of Education, and the U.S. Department of Health and Services. This scientific reading research was studied to be available for educators, parents, policy-makers, and others with an interest in helping all people learn to read well.
This paper gives a guidance to teachers how to teach children the reading successfully. It describes the findings of the National Reading Panel Report and provides analysis and discussion in five areas of reading instructions: phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and text comprehension covering from kindergarten to the grade three.
Phonemic awareness instruction. It shows various example activities to build phonemic awareness. Identify and categorize phonemes, blend phonemes to form words, segment words into phonemes, delete or add phonemesto form new words, and substitute phonemes to make new words. Phonemic awareness is the understanding that the sounds of spoken language work together to make words. This paper suggests various activities in blending and segmenting words.
Phonics instruction. Along with phonics instruction, young children should be solidifying their knowledge of the alphabet, engaging in phomenic awareness activities, and listening to stories and informational texts read aloud to them. They also should be reading text (both loudly and silently), writing letters, words, messages, and stories. This paper suggests to use practice materials such as short books and use in practicing writing and workbooks.
Fluency instruction. Reading to children is not the only benefit of fluency but also increase their knowledge of the world, their vocabulary, their familiarity with written language, and their interest in reading. Through reading aloud, children also can learn listening and speaking. This paper suggests the activity of perform a play to teach fluency.
Vocabulary instruction. Vocabulary is very important. It describes how to teach vocabulary indirectly and directly by illustrate examples of classroom instructions.
Text comprehension instruction. It shows the effective comprehension strategies for teacher : Explanation, thinking aloud, guided practice, application, and for students : Asking questions about the text they are reading; summarizing parts of the text; clarifying words and sentences they don’t understand; and predicting what might occur next in the text.
Review:
This paper concluded by key finding from the scientific research and answers the questions form. This paper made a conclusion based on huge amounts of scientific researches, this make this paper credible. In addition, questions and answering form made readers to understand the message very quickly and precisely.
This paper suggests many topics to ponder in English education for Korean students in EFS environment, where only the phonics are taught not for phonemic awareness. We can see the precise and step-by-step curriculum how to teach young children literacy. This can be one of supporting article that EFL context such as Korea should start English by reading and in the class, amount of education between speaking, listening, writing and reading should be balanced for young children .
Citation 2:
Acha, J. (2009). The effectiveness of multimedia programmes in children’s vocabulary learning. British journal of educational technology, 40(1), 23-31.
Summary:
This paper was to examine which presentation mode is more effective for primary school children who are learning new vocabulary in a second language with a self-paced multimedia programme : either presenting only one stimulus (either verbal or pictorial) or presenting two stimuli simultaneously (verbal and pictorial). Participants were 135 third and fourth grade Spanish children and they read an interactive multimedia short English story presented by a computer program. Twelve key words(donkey, drawer, penknife, hammer, bricks, ladybird, waistcoat, bonnet, mittens, jug, tray and napkin) were inside the button. These words were unknown to the children by pretest and author tested the vocabulary after the children read the story with the multimedia programme. In this multimedia, children click the button on unknown words while reading. There were three groups that could see the corresponding annotation word-only, picture-only, both word and picture. An ANCOVA was used to analysis the research. The ‘word-only’ group shows higher percentage of recalled words than the ‘word and picture’ group, both in the immediate and the delayed posttest.
Generally, we think that combined use of a word and a picture may reinforce the memory trace in children, but this paper revealed different concept. The present data strongly suggest that adding the picture to the word involves extra cognitive resources. For that reason, in a second language vocabulary learning multimedia program for children, presenting only a word is more effective than presenting the word together with the picture or only the picture.
Yet, this paper cited other studies that when high-order processes are involved , integration of information, pictures have been useful to interpret text and construct deep understanding.
Review:
To developing materials it is important to understand the particular context and the particular course. Teachers nowadays have to recognize the digital context that postmodern students are related. The new possibilities of e-learning with hypermedia formats and the individualization of the learning process calls for integrated educational and techno-logical research as a means to assure effective learning results. This paper assist to teachers how to use digital sources and to curriculum developer how to develop the digital materials in terms of learning language.
Author claims that simultaneous presentation of verbal and pictorial stimuli has not always proved to be useful in self-based learning, probably because of limited working-memory capacity for a detailed description of working memory. This paper could change the teaching vocabulary pedagogy in Korea.
Citation 3:
Richard, R.D. (1993). The Writing Activities for Extensive Reading. New ways in teaching reading, 51(4), 188-189.
Summary:
In extensive reading, students select their own books and read a great deal at their own pace. They are encouraged to read easy and interesting books and to stop reading a book if it is too hard, too easy, or boring. Generally, students do not answer comprehension questions on the books they have read. When students have finished reading a book, the author does not give them comprehension questions or test them on what they have read. Rather the author uses activities that allow them to draw on their reading to help them with other aspects of English, such as increasing their vocabulary knowledge or improving their oral fluency.
Many teachers of English, in both second and foreign language contexts, are familiar with the activity called free writing. The purpose of free writing is to help students get started, to generate ideas, often considered one of the most difficult steps in writing. Generally, the teacher does not correct or evaluate free writing. Here are the instructions that the author gives to his students for timed repeated thinking and writing:
1. For one minute, think about a book that you have read.
2. Now write about the book for two minutes.
3. Stop. For two minutes, read what you wrote and think again about the story.
4. Now write again for two minutes. Start over from the beginning. (Do not continue from what your wrote in step 2.)
5. Repeat step 3.
6. Repeat step 4.
Teachers of English might also be familiar with timed repeated reading, an activity that helps learners improve their reading fluency. Students are instructed to read a text at a comfortable pace for overall understanding for a set period of time, often one or two minutes. At the end of the time, they stop, making the last word they read. They go back to the beginning of the text, read again for the same period of time, stop, and mark the last word. The process is repeated a third time. Most often, learners read more the second and third times than they did the first time.
Timed repeated skimming and writing combines timed repeated reading with timed repeated writing. Instead of reading at a comfortable pace for overall understanding, students skim their books. Then they write about their books for a given period of time. The goals are to improve the skill of skimming, to help students with getting started in the writing process, and to help students become more fluent writers.
Review:
The author is a strong supporter of extensive reading. Good things happen when EFL students read extensively. Studies show that they not only become fluent readers, but they also learn new words and expand their understanding of words they knew before. In addition, they write better, and their listening and speaking abilities improve. Extensive reading activities such as the two described in this article make student reading a resource for language practice in reading, vocabulary learning, listening, speaking, and writing.
Citation 4:
Bock, R. (1995). Why Children Succeed or Fail at Reading. NICHD's program in learning disabilities, 10, 120-126.
Summary:
Most children will learn to read, no matter what method is used to teach them. But unless they receive special help, at least 20 percent of them cannot master this simple task that the rest of us take for granted. Their difficulty is painfully obvious when they try to read out loud. Children with reading difficulties stop and start frequently, mispronouncing some words and skipping others entirely. The first casualty is self esteem: they soon grow ashamed as they struggle with a skill their classmates master easily. In the later grades, when children switch from learning to read to reading to learn, reading-impaired children are kept from exploring science, history, literature, mathematics and the wealth of information that is presented in print. In America, about 10 million children have difficulties learning to read. From 10 to 15 percent eventually drop out of high school; only 2 percent complete a four-year college program.
The words we speak are made up of individual pieces of sound that scientists refer to as phonemes. The word “bag,” for example, has three phonemes. The problem arises in converting the natural process to print. NICHD studies have found that at least 20 percent of children must be taught English letter-sound system directly in order to learn to read successfully. The greatest possibility for success lies in identifying and treating these children before they reach third grade.
Instructors, usually working in small groups, can explicitly show children that words are made up of tiny sound segments. There are many ways to impart this knowledge. One way is to have children clap in sequence as each speech sound in a word is slowly pronounced. Other methods may involve having children move a small plastic tab or other marker as each sound is made. After the students master this step, instructors can teach them that the letters in words stand for the tiny sounds in speech. This teaching technique, commonly referred to as “phonics” instruction, is usually again introduced slowly at first, perhaps in combination with putting plastic markers beneath letters on a page in sequence with each letter the student “sounds out”. After this phase of instruction is completed, and when children can read the words on the page in an accurate and rapid manner, the student can then be exposed to teaching methods that emphasize immersing children in good literature.
Review:
Early results of other studies suggest that key areas of the brains of people with reading disabilities function differently than in people who read easily. NICHD-funded scientists are also taking advantage of powerful new technologies that allow them to observe the inner workings of the brain. One such method, functional magnetic resonance imaging, uses a computer-directed, magnetic device to obtain brain images. Using this technique, researchers are comparing the brain function of people with reading disabilities to the brain functioning of skilled readers. It is hoped that the technique will allow them to observe the changes that that take place in the brain as individuals learn to overcome their reading impairment. These research projects may one day provide the basis for effective new treatments for reading disabilities.
Citation 5 :
Sun, G.Y. (2000). A Case Study of Communicative Language Teaching in China. TESL Canada, 3(1), 67-86.
Summary:
This paper discusses the implementation of communicative language teaching (CLT) methodology within the English as a foreign language (EFL) context in the Peoples’ Republic of China. It suggests investigating the context of an English language teaching program first, and then adapting the program to the Chinese context in order to more effectively implement the communicative methodology. Key questions regarding curriculum design are used as a case study of an EFL context in China. It is concluded that there must be a compromise between CLT methodology and the EFL context, because CLT is at root a curriculum development. Three principles are judged to be helpful in understanding this problem: (1) in EFL teaching, the impact from the context on a program is more significant than in the English as a second language (ESL) context. The more that is known about the context, the better the new methodology can be adapted into the program: (2) Introducing methods of classroom activities is helpful, but not sufficient; adaptation should start from the beginning of the curriculum design; and (3) Adaptation of teaching methodology will be more successful if the theory of learning and teaching where CLT methodology is derived from is reviewed and studied with the characteristics of the program context in mind.
Review:
In this paper, a preliminary stage of context assessment of curriculum design in an EFL context in China is suggested. A framework of context is provided for developing a communicative language teaching program in China. In trying to integrating context into curriculum, three fundamental questions are raised and discussed. The situation and practice of adapting communicative language teaching methodology in Private Pui Ching Commercial College is discussed as a case study. There has to be compromise between CLT methodology and the conditions and provisions of the context in which it is to be implemented. The adaption of CLT in the EFL context is first of all a curriculum development.
The problems around the adaptation of communicative language teaching methodology in China are only partly addressed. They believe the following principles will be helpful in understanding this problem:
1. In EFL teaching, the impact from the context on a program is more significant than that in an ESL context. The more they know about the context the better we can adapt this new methodology into the program.
2. Introducing methods of classroom activities is helpful, but not sufficient. The adaptation should start from the beginning of the curriculum design. Conditions of the context should be taken into account throughout the whole process of program development.
3. Adaptation of teaching methodology will be more successful if the theory of learning and teaching where CLT methodology is derived from is reviewed and studied with the characteristics of the program context in mind.
Citation 6 :
Chard, D. J., & Osborn, J. (1999). Phonics and recognition instruction in early reading program: Guidelines for accessibility. Learning disabilities research and practice, 14(2), 107-117.
Summary:
A study investigated school and classroom factors related to primary-grade reading achievement, using quantitative and descriptive methods. Fourteen schools across the United States with moderate to high numbers of students on subsidized lunch were identified as most, moderately, or least effective based on several measures of reading achievement. A combination of school and teacher factors was found to be important in the most effective schools. Significant factors included: (1) strong links to parents; (2) systematic assessment of pupil progress; (3) strong building communication; (4) a collaborative model for reading instruction, including early reading interventions; (5) time spent in small group instruction; (6) time spent in independent reading; (7) high pupil engagement; and (8) strong home communication. The most accomplished teachers were frequently observed teaching word recognition by coaching as children were reading, providing explicit phonics instruction, and asking higher level questions after reading. In all of the most effective schools, reading was clearly a priority at both the building and classroom levels.
Review:
In this paper, the most interesting part is that the author considers family background and reading performance. Also the author outlines a non-categorical approach to reading disability, describes the reading intervention program they have developed for older low-progress readers and seeks to demonstrate how students from socially disadvantaged backgrounds can, and do, make substantial progress when offered effective reading instruction based on the available scientific research evidence.
Sunday, May 9, 2010
Module #4 - Chapter 4, 8, and 9 Reflection (mind map)
Conceptualizing content is a matter of articulating what we will explicitly teach or explicitly focus on in the course and knowing why we have made those choices. It also involves choosing the organizing principle or principles that will help to tie the content together. (Graves, 2000, p.39).
The process of conceptualizing content is a multifaceted one which involves:
- Thinking about what we want your students to learn in the course, given who they are, their needs, and the purpose of the course
- Making decisions about what to include and emphasize and what to drop
- Organizing the content in a way that will help us to see the relationship among various elements so that we can make decisions about objectives, materials, sequence and evaluation.
The product of conceptualizing content is a kind of syllabus in that it delineates what we will teach. The form is like mind map, grid, list, flow chart, how detailed it is, whether it is one that someone else can interpret and use. Also we have to know a framework for organizing the ways or categories for conceptualizing content. There are 3 categories for conceptualizing content : focus on language, focus on learning and learners, and focus on social context. (Graves, 2000, p43)
Mind map is a good tool for conceptualizing for teachers so I searched appropriated examples for young children on google. This is a really good example about math curriculum of pre-k.
It’s awesome to see the syllabus at a glance but Explanation full of implications was not enough to let other understand it.
http://www.gogeometry.com/geometry/geometry_children_pre_k_mind_map.html
Chapter 8 Developing Materials
The materials development means creating, choosing or adapting, and organizing materials and activities so that students can achieve the objectives that will help them reach the goals of the course (Graves, 2000, p.150). Decisions about developing materials are rooted in your beliefs, understandings, and experience. They also depend on your goals and objectives, the way you conceptualize the content of the course, the way you organize and sequence your course, and your understanding of your students’ needs (Graves, 2000, p.166).
As a program coordinator, I devoted lots of time to develop materials such as worksheets, activity plans or workbooks but sometimes I felt just like Iris Broudy “I must remember that it is not the materials themselves, but what the students do with them that is important. At the same time, I need to keep reminding myself that materials can be developed without high-tech resources and hours of planning, and those may be the ones that best respond to the immediate need of the students” (Graves, 2000, p.167).
Through this chapter, I have an opportunity my idea about developing materials. Flexibility is important so that we can provide materials that are engaging and appropriate and also allow our students to use them productively in the classroom.
Chapter 9 Adapting a textbook
When we are using textbooks in our classroom, there are advantages and disadvantages of textbooks as below,
advantages
- It provides a syllabus for the course because the authors have made decisions about what will be learned and in what order.
- It provides security for the students because they know what to expect and what is expected of them.
- It provides a set of visuals, activities, readings, etc., and so saves the teacher time in finding or developing such materials.
- It provides teachers with a basis for assessing student’s learning.
- It may include supporting materials.
- It provides consistency within a program across a given level, if teachers use the same textbook.
disadvantages
- The content or examples may not be relevant or appropriate to the group you are teaching.- The content may not be at the right level.- There may be too much focus on one or more aspects of language and not enough focus on others, or it may not include everything you want to include.
- There may not be right mix of activities.- The sequence is lockstep.
- The activities, readings, visuals, etc. may be boring.
- The material may go out of date
- The timetable for completing the textbook or parts of it may be unrealistic.
Whenever I had to choose the appropriate textbooks at the beginning of new semester, I felt that it was really difficult to decide it. Graves mentioned about 4 steps for ongoing assessment ands decision making.
Stage 1 Planning how to teach with the text
Stage 2 Teaching with the text
Stage 3 Replanning how to teach
Stage 4 Reteaching
It’s a good idea to reuse and reteach with the same textbook and put the small note such as post-it on the book. But our foreign English teachers go back to their own country after finishing 1-year contract(we support them to issue 1 year working visa as an English instructor) therefore it’s hard to reteach it. But each time we try to go through the cycle of planning, teaching, replanning and reteaching with current teachers before they leave here in order to become more comfortable making choices about what to emphasize, what to leave out, and where to supplement and personalize the material.
Sunday, May 2, 2010
Teacher Curriculum Interview
Podcast: http://sooyeunkim.podomatic.com/
I had an interview with Mr. Kamil Ward who is a kindergarten teacher at CCLC and working in Korea for 10 years. Actually he is one of our foreign teachers of my kindergarten. Usually foreign teacher go back to their country after working in Korea as an English instructor for 1-2 years. Mr. Ward experienced to work at many kind of school or language institute for 10 years so I was curious what kind of school is the best for children from the point of view of a teacher.
Here are my questions I asked.
1. Please introduce yourself briefly.
2. What’s your teaching experience?
3. Could you tell me about the English program you are teaching? For example, target teaching level, class size, etc.
4. Does your school give teaching autonomy or do you have to follow the prescribed curriculum?
5. Who decides to choose the main textbook? Or do you develop and use your own materials appropriate to your class?
6. What material do you usually use in your class?
7. What kind of material is the most effective to your students?
8. How do you handle the curriculum, if the curriculum does not meet the needs of your students?
9. How do you evaluate your student’s progress?
10. What are your beliefs as a teacher?
11. What do you think teachers’ role in class?
12. What do you think of Korean education for English?
As I mentioned above, I tried to provide set curriculum and let first year of new coming foreign teachers just follow a prescribed text and methods after combining English program with Korean kindergarten curriculum. Because Native English teachers have no experience to teach young learner and no idea about teaching English to children and taking care of them.
As Graves(2000) mentioned, most teachers don’t have opportunities to make their beliefs explicit because the institutions in which they work do not generally ask them to articulate their beliefs nor do they place a value on such articulation. I didn’t have enough time to know Mr. Ward and was curious why he kept working in Korea.
As you know, I'm an owner of private kindergarten. Sometimes I have a hard time with my employees, I mean, teachers. Although I have a MA degree of early childhood education, I don't have much experience to teach children directly and I've worked as an administrator. Through this interview, I realized our teacher tried to make our prescribed curriculum better and put their own idea into it. Also they are struggling to enhance children's language proficiency as much as I am doing.
Except IT problem(actually, I tried to upload MP3 file of teacher interview on Podcast site over hundreds times, but it's not still working), it was a wonderful chance to put myself in teacher's shoes. It’s a good time to know each other as teachers for children.
Sunday, April 25, 2010
Module # 2 Reading Reflection (Chapter 2 & 3)
Graves gives us three pieces of advice. 1) To try to get as much information as possible by asking for it specifically or by trying to find others who have taught in that context. 2) To design the course with a similar group in mind, if we have knowledge of such a group, so that we are not foiled when making decisions. 3) To work into our course design process flexibility so that we have more than option at each step of the way. (Graves, K., 2000, p20) It’s really important to define our context in order to design a good curriculum.
In chapter 3, Graves said that our beliefs play a role at each stage of course design. They may not always be present in our thinking, but they underlie the decisions we make. (Graves, K., 2000, p33) Last quarter, I took a course of making various instructional lesson plans. After finishing the course, I realized that I put some storybooks into every instructional plan whenever I began a lesson. I believe that to read a storybook to young learner is very important in order to make children understand the goal of lesson and activity. Beliefs are not necessarily something that teachers can easily articulate or are completely aware of because no schools or no supervisors ask us to articulate our beliefs. But I think that it needs to ask ourselves about our beliefs in order to make our beliefs more explicit. To join this MA program is the process to make my beliefs about teaching more explicit.
Saturday, April 17, 2010
Module # 1 First Assignment
My name is Sooyeun Kim. I’m the mother of 2 kids, 13 year old boy, Weesu and 11 year old girl, Weena and a director of my own kindergarten in Seoul, Korea.
• What is your B.A. degree major, where did you complete it, and when?
My undergraduate degree was Social Work but I did graduate work in Early Childhood Education. I got both of degrees in Ewha Womans University in 1993 and 2004.
• Are you a pre-service teacher and if so, what is your target teaching level?
I worked at education field for construction workers for 4 years then I operated my own business to import children’s toy, carseat, strollers etc. from European countries and the States. When I opened my kindergarten in 2002, I didn’t have any experience to teach young kids and take care of them at all so I entered MA program for early childhood education. Couple of years later, we had reinforced English program for young learners, finally I decided to join TESOL MA program.
I don’t still have a plan to teach students directly but absolutely my interest is to learn an effective and efficient method to teach young kids such as kindergarteners and elementary school students
• If you are currently teaching, what is the school, grade, subject? Are your current and target teaching levels the same or different?
We have 2 kinds of programs for 4 to 7 Korean aged kindergarteners and 1st to 6th graders of elementary school.
• What is your experience with the school curriculum as a learner and/or as a teacher?
I have an experience to learn Montessori for 1 year. It was awesome and helpful to understand children’s behavior pattern and way of thought.
Montessori is not a method of teaching, but a philosophy of life. It is faith in each child as a potential new beginning for humanity. They see the child as creator of the man he will become. Each child has an inner force for his own development that can be observed in his spontaneous activities.
It is the purpose to observe the child’s natural interests and activities and provide for him an environment in which he can develop and learn.
Within the structured order of the Montessori class, the child is free to choose his own projects through the hours of each day. Dr. Montessori believed that self-motivation is the only valid impulse to learning. As each child follows his own inner direction, he works out for himself a personal pattern of learning which fits his needs and abilities. This results in a joy of learning and satisfaction in work. In the Montessori classroom, it is the child who is active rather than the teacher.
I like the child centered curriculum but it’s hard to expect children’s performance in short term.
• What mobile technologies are you comfortable with? Which applications do you use on your cell phone? Have you ever used mobile devices for language learning or teaching?
I need grandma’s glasses so it’s getting more difficult to read text messages on the screen of my cell phone. But I’m familiar with using cell phone, MP3, voice recorder etc.
• What your expectations form a curriculum design course would be?
I’d like to learn how to design good curriculum for young learners then I will make our school curriculum better.